I am, as you probably know, a fan of beverage companies. One of my largest holdings is Diageo (DGE) which I last topped-up in December and recently analysed over on Seeking Alpha.
However, I also hold soft-drinks maker Britvic (BVIC) which I bought in April 2015. Soft drinks remain, for me, a very attractive prospect. But you can't look at the sector without your eye turning to the mother of all soft-drinks makers: Coca-Cola (KO).
Coca-Cola continues to impress even in the face of fairly flat volume growth and modest but consistent underlying (that is, constant currency) revenue growth. A large part of this reason is its remarkably rewarding attitude towards shareholders' return. This is an issue I have only recently looked at in more depth. But I am glad I did.
However, I also hold soft-drinks maker Britvic (BVIC) which I bought in April 2015. Soft drinks remain, for me, a very attractive prospect. But you can't look at the sector without your eye turning to the mother of all soft-drinks makers: Coca-Cola (KO).
Coca-Cola continues to impress even in the face of fairly flat volume growth and modest but consistent underlying (that is, constant currency) revenue growth. A large part of this reason is its remarkably rewarding attitude towards shareholders' return. This is an issue I have only recently looked at in more depth. But I am glad I did.
Here I plan to focus on this aspect rather than the company
generally (which I hope to analyze more fully another time to follow up on my last analysis of Coca-Cola on Seeking Alpha in December 2015).
The company continues to throw bucket loads of cash at its
investors. Obviously, the dividend is the most prominent form of return. But
this is just the beginning. Coca-Cola returns much more than this each year
through share buybacks, which has helped underpin the healthy dividend growth
in recent years.
Here I plan to take a little look at what I mean.
Excellent Dividend Growth
Coca-Cola is, of course, a dividend aristocrat. But its long
history of dividend growth isn't just what impresses. Indeed, its growth rate
has been pretty staggering considering a fairly flat few years:
This is an incredible rate of growth which, I am sure,
delights any investor who has held Coca-Cola for the last five years. But how
have they achieved this? Partly through underlying growth, but also through
extensive and consistent shareholders' return.
Epic Shareholders' Yield
Certainly the dividend is by far the largest proportion of
the shareholder return. But Coca-Cola has also consistently returned cash by
other means. Chiefly, share buybacks:
All in all, over the last five years they have passed back
around about 100% of their FCF to shareholders. Most of this through dividends,
but a smaller yet significant amount through buybacks.
As a result of this two-pronged approach to shareholder
returns investors have received a pretty generous shareholders' yield:
To consistently see a return (excluding share price
appreciation) of over 4.3% from a company with such a strong market position
and attractive brands as Coca-Cola (not to mention the low volatility) is
fantastic to see.
What is more, if you had bought in late 2011 at $35 you
would be seeing a dividend yield on cost of nearly 3.8%. Not bad at all.
Declining Share Count, Bolstering Dividend
As a result of this significant repurchase of shares, the
share count has dropped about 4.5% since 2011:
Shares Issued (million)
|
Change
|
|
2011
|
4526
|
-1.27%
|
2012
|
4469
|
-1.26%
|
2013
|
4402
|
-1.50%
|
2014
|
4366
|
-0.82%
|
2015
|
4324
|
-0.96%
|
Total
|
-4.46%
|
The impact this has on a company like Coca-Cola whose
dividend obligations are sizeable is important.
Let's assume that Coca-Cola had not repurchased any shares
since 2010 (hence still had 4.584 billion shares still issued) but had produced
the same per share dividend growth. This is the impact that it would have had
on their total dividend payments:
By 2015, the buybacks had chipped off $310 million per year
in cash needed to fund the dividend had they paid out $1.32 to each share as of
2010.
In reality, they have used this saving to turbocharge
dividend growth on the back of shrinking EBIT and fairly modest growth in FCF:
If Coca-Cola was to pay out the exact same amount of cash as
a dividend but without the assistance of the buyback program the dividend would
have amounted to $1.25 per share rather than the $1.32 per share actually
received.
A yield, that is, of 2.8% rather than the 3% it currently
yields. Considering this is just over a 5 year period, the impact is hardly
small.
Buybacks Set to Continue
This is precisely why it is important that at Q4/FY 2015
time Coca-Cola had this to say about 2016 on the back of
the $2.3 billion in share repurchases in 2015:
We are targeting full-year 2016 net share repurchases of $2.0 to $2.5 billion.
With revenue and EPS growth set to be pretty slow or flat
over the next couple of years, share buybacks will be increasingly important in
underpinning the generous dividend and its continued growth.
Buybacks sometimes get attacked, and sometimes rightly.
However, when well executed they can offer significant long-term shareholder
value. Coca-Cola seems to have mastered this.
There Are Better Uses Surely?
Now, of course, this cash could be used elsewhere.
Acquisitions or debt reduction, for instance. And this would also be a good use
of such cash. Regarding debt reduction it would certainly be attractive with
debt levels having grown noticeably in recent years:
However, Coca-Cola continues to attract favourable interest
rates courtesy of its strong ratings with the main agencies even when compared
to its strongly performing peers (to see how I normalize credit ratings read this previous article on Seeking Alpha):*
The strong and stable cash flows and incredible brand power
means it can borrow cheaply. In such an environment returning cash to investors
through dividends and buybacks seems very attractive indeed.
This is especially true for Coca-Cola whose dividend is a
major attraction for investors and major item on their cash flows. The
cumulative benefits of share buybacks on keeping dividend growth coming without
the dividend payments becoming unmanageable for Coca-Cola is transparently
obvious.
Conclusion
The 3% dividend yield from Coca-Cola is just the beginning
of its attraction. Its longstanding buyback program, set to continue into 2016
has enhanced shareholder returns significantly over recent years. With it set
to yield (including buybacks) around the 4.5% again in 2016, it is hard to
argue that Coca-Cola is not an attractive investment.
The importance of Coca-Cola's buybacks should not be
underestimated, however. Keeping an eye on their pace in the future is
important for investors. But right now, it looks like they are set to continue
for some time. In turn, the dividend looks set to continue its march forward.
Coca-Cola remains, to me, a compelling income stock. But it attractions reach
beyond simply the dividend.
The important thing here is its implications for other beverage makers. Growth for them is often slow but steady, yet they turbocharge growth in EPS and dividends through share buybacks (and indeed, businesses in other areas do the same) . Overlooking this when analysing their income potential seems, in hindsight, unfortunate. Something to ponder on in future!
The important thing here is its implications for other beverage makers. Growth for them is often slow but steady, yet they turbocharge growth in EPS and dividends through share buybacks (and indeed, businesses in other areas do the same) . Overlooking this when analysing their income potential seems, in hindsight, unfortunate. Something to ponder on in future!
Notes
* Peers on this occasion are PepsiCo (PEP) and Dr Pepper Snapple (DPS).
Why not also follow me on Twitter and like me on Facebook?
[Creative Commons image reproduced from Flickr user gillyberlin.]
Hola, DD:
ReplyDeleteFollowing your analysis from Spain.
I,ve also read your articles in Seeking Alpha about Diageo & Unilever.
I,m divided grotwth investing strategy oriented.
In my diversification process I,m invested, as you, in Diageo, ULVR, GSK, BHP, Carillion, Hsbc, RDSB, BP, NG, and V, Dis, Jnj, PG.
Recently I iniciated a first position in ImperialTobacco, but i will wait to add cause is close to highs.
Also in LGen.
Could you share any opinion about investing in this moment in Interserve -close to 3years lows- Legal&Generaland, (are a market downtutn or a companies structural downturns?), IMB...
I seee very interesting your positions in Britvic and PZCussons, but i didnt consider tnem by now. Maybe becouse we, abroad, have very few information about that companies.
Go on the great work.
Preikestolen
Hi Preikestolen. Thanks for the nice comment. Glad you have been enjoying my writing in various places!
DeleteIt sounds as though we have a lot of overlap at present. you have picked up some nice companies in the meantime!
Imperial Tobacco would be a little expensive for me right now as a buy. It is a great company, but the valuation has rocketed since I initiated my position some years ago. Great dividend though. You should do well despite the high price at present.
Interserve is an interesting one. It is a well-managed company. It has been hit mostly due to the national living wage introduced here in the UK which will raise costs for companies like IRV (Carillion has also suffered as a result, for example). Short term this will dent earnings, certainly. However the companies remains attractive in my eyes for the long-term investor. Indeed, Interserve's dividend now looks very generous as well as well-covered.
Legal & General seems to have suffered alongside the banks as it (and many other insurers) have quite extensive exposure to banking bonds. They tend to hold until expiry though, so unless the banks go bust I don't really think the share price pressure was entirely fair. Their growth and push for greater cash generation continues apace so I think they still look good both from a short and long-term perspective.
Britvic and PZ Cussons are nice looking consumer companies in my eyes. PZC does a lot of trade in Nigeria and Asia. Britvic a lot in the UK, France and now Brazil. They recently released "Fruit Shoot" in Spain, I believe. Great companies. Definitely find out more. PZC has suffered due to its exposure to the Nigerian economy which (faced by commodity headwinds) has been hit quite hard of late. Long-term the company remains compelling as does its exposure there.
Hope that is of use to you!
DD
Hi, DD.
DeleteThaks for your answer and thoughts.
Really you entered in very good point to IMB.
I see is closed to highs, so I,ll wait to add.
It,s interesting its future options in eCigarrettes with Blu Vap.
I like PM cause its favourable taxations.
The market even in ftse100 is depressed now, maybe we have time for sitting in good price until the Brexit voting in June. Who knows!
Greetings.
Sorry for the delayed response, Preikestolen. I certainly did. Got very lucky with my IMB holding. Kicking myself I did not start with a larger position. I was going to build it up over time. Probably not at this price, however.
DeleteThe price has moderated a bit recently (not today, however). The Brexit vote may throw up an opportunity. I am sitting on more cash than normal at the moment.